Question 1

Can't we just use Claude / build this ourselves?

Accepted Answer

Ad hoc Claude works if your team manually assembles the right logs, code snippets, and customer context before every question, and is okay starting from scratch each time. Most teams that go down the build-your-own path spend 6 months and 2 engineers getting to an MVP. Then the person who built it leaves, access breaks, new tooling gets introduced, and the context disappears with them. What's left is a tool that worked on day one and breaks silently as your stack evolves: no one owning it, no audit trail, no shared memory of what was learned. Pebble is live in days, maintained continuously, and gets smarter with every ticket your team closes.

Question 2

We already have AI Deflection. Isn't that the same thing?

Accepted Answer

Deflection answers what is already in your knowledge base, and that is table stakes now. Pebble handles what is not: the roughly 30% of tickets that need real investigation across your systems, from stack traces and code changes to billing, account state, and contracts. Those are the ones that still land on a human. Deflection and Pebble sit at different points in the same support stack.

Question 3

Will engineering approve this?

Accepted Answer

Engineers tend to be Pebble's biggest advocates. Requests from customer-facing teams used to take up 30% of their time. Pebble handles those. When tickets do reach them, they arrive with the full context and a PR already open. Every code change still requires human review and approval before it ships, everything is logged and auditable, and Pebble operates with tightly scoped access it cannot act outside of. Engineering gets time back and stays in control.

Question 4

What about security and data access?

Accepted Answer

Pebble is SOC 2 compliant. It operates with tightly scoped production access it cannot act outside of, and every action is logged and auditable. Role permissions are built in: support sees what they need, engineering stays in control of what ships. You can review our full compliance posture at trust.heypebble.com.

Question 5

What does this cost relative to the problem it solves?

Accepted Answer

The average engineering escalation costs 2 to 4 hours of engineer time. If Pebble resolves 1 in 3 technical tickets without engineering, and your team handles dozens per month, the math is straightforward. Most customers recover the cost in the first week. We're happy to work through the numbers on your specific volume during a demo.

Question 6

How does it work with my help desk?

Accepted Answer

Pebble runs as a native app inside your help desk, whether that is Zendesk, Intercom, or Salesforce Service Cloud, so your team never leaves the tool they already work in. When a technical ticket comes in, Pebble investigates across your code, logs, and systems, then posts an internal note with the root cause and a drafted reply for your team to send. It installs as a private app in your workspace, and most teams are live within a day.

Question 7

How long does setup take?

Accepted Answer

Pebble connects to Slack, Intercom, Zendesk, Jira, Linear, and your codebase in one onboarding session. Most teams are live within a day.

Two kinds of tickets stall your queue.

Tickets that need another team

Tickets that burn hours

Faster resolution. Happier customers.
Stronger engineering partnership.

Close more technical tickets, faster.

Increase CSAT, decrease churn.

Bring engineering solutions, not problems.

How Pebble resolves a technical ticket in minutes.

No migration, no new workflow, no platform decision.

Questions we hear before every demo